Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (CROSS)

Author: Alastair Soane

Date published

1 June 2016

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (CROSS)

Tag
Author
Alastair Soane
Date published
1 June 2016
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Alastair Soane

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 94, Issue 6, 2016, Page(s) 34

Date published

1 June 2016

Author

Alastair Soane

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 94, Issue 6, 2016, Page(s) 34

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The latest CROSS newsletter from Structural-Safety includes news of an initiative to investigate weather-related damage to buildings.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
34
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Safety Professional Guidance Issue 6

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Managing Health & Safety Risks (No. 51): Hazards from gas</h4>

Managing Health & Safety Risks (No. 51): Hazards from gas

This article shows why gas leaks and their consequences should be one of the standard hazards considered in any risk assessment.

Date – 1 June 2016
Author – The Institution of Structural Engineers' Health and Safety Panel
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Engineer's Guide to PI Claims. Part 5: Defence arguments – partial defences</h4>

Engineer's Guide to PI Claims. Part 5: Defence arguments – partial defences

Our series from Griffiths & Armour turns its attention from complete to partial defence arguments when faced with a professional indemnity (PI) claim.

Date – 1 June 2016
Author – Griffiths & Armour
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
Image showing up close deterioration of oriented strand board

CROSS Safety Report: Durability issues with engineered timber

This month's report concerns durability issues with engineered timber due to water ingress or condensation issues. Engineered timber appears to disintegrate more quickly than conventional timber, resulting in structural failure rather than distortion.

Date – 1 July 2024
Author – Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures
Price – £0