Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (CROSS) – Newsletter No. 44

Author: Alastair Soane

Date published

1 December 2016

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (CROSS) – Newsletter No. 44

Tag
Author
Alastair Soane
Date published
1 December 2016
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Author

Alastair Soane

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 94, Issue 12, 2016, Page(s) 36

Date published

1 December 2016

Author

Alastair Soane

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 94, Issue 12, 2016, Page(s) 36

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

This article summarises CROSS newsletter No. 44 from Structural-Safety.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
36
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Safety Professional Guidance Issue 12

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Managing Health & Safety Risks (No. 57): Hazards from ground movement</h4>

Managing Health & Safety Risks (No. 57): Hazards from ground movement

This article covers the hazards associated with ground movement, and how this can be mitigated through detailed risk assessments.

Date – 1 December 2016
Author – The Institution of Structural Engineers' Health and Safety Panel
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Engineer's Guide to PI Claims. Part 11: Post-loss reviews and lessons learned</h4>

Engineer's Guide to PI Claims. Part 11: Post-loss reviews and lessons learned

We conclude the series on professional indemnity claims from Griffiths & Armour with a look at what engineers can gain from a post-loss review.

Date – 1 December 2016
Author – Griffiths & Armour
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
Image showing up close deterioration of oriented strand board

CROSS Safety Report: Durability issues with engineered timber

This month's report concerns durability issues with engineered timber due to water ingress or condensation issues. Engineered timber appears to disintegrate more quickly than conventional timber, resulting in structural failure rather than distortion.

Date – 1 July 2024
Author – Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures
Price – £0